New Guiness Record?

-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0\|705\|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> On Topic -> New Guiness Record?
Thu, 17 Jul 2008, 08:47
Afr0	-=-=- Afr0 Games Project Dollhouse on Github - Please fork!
Thu, 17 Jul 2008, 09:40
Jayenkai	Blimey!!
Thu, 17 Jul 2008, 11:55
blanko1324	That's some serious coding right there.
Thu, 17 Jul 2008, 14:27
Scherererer	wow. Maybe you ought to just use a really big constructor? -=-=- YouTube Twitter Computer Science Series: Logic (pt1) (part 2) (part 3) 2's Complement Mathematics: Basic Differential Calculus
Thu, 17 Jul 2008, 15:33
Afr0	Well, the reason I went with this system, which I read about in the book 'Effective Java', is that a normal constructor would be extremely hard to read. This system is easier to read, but probably almost twice as long. So... I'm a bit undecided. -=-=- Afr0 Games Project Dollhouse on Github - Please fork!
Thu, 17 Jul 2008, 15:53
mole	I don't get it o.0
Thu, 17 Jul 2008, 16:03
Afr0	Hehe, what it essentially is, is a long chained-function call. So, I wouldn't be getting the world record for 'longest constructor', but 'longest chain of function calls used in serious programming'. Java doesn't support properties like C#, so I have to make due with set functions. -=-=- Afr0 Games Project Dollhouse on Github - Please fork!
Thu, 17 Jul 2008, 17:31
mole	Oh! I get it now! I didn't notice that that block was all one thingy-ma-bo! It is quite impressive, to be honest.