|
|
|
Retro
|
C++ If this or that?20th August 2018 If the range of case values is limited, using an array lookup may be faster than a switch statement. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Firewire13th August 2018 I used it for my old iPod :) |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Using Cobra15th June 2018 I bought it but didn't get much use out of it. I found it a bit buggy. Compared to BMax the Pascal language was limited (no OOP) as was Windows only support. The .EXE generated was a bit hefty too. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
RIP : Leslie Grantham15th June 2018 I remember he also had a bit part on Blake's 7. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Job or No Job15th June 2018 You bet! And loving it :D |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Job or No Job13th June 2018 Aspiring to be somebody else's bitch is the mentality of a slave. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Forever PM Borks20th March 2018 Is PM feature not working, or is it just me? |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
New Doctor's Outfit - 2017/189th November 2017 I would have gone more for a Lara Croft look. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
GamePascal3rd December 2013 Still in alpha, so risk of becoming vaporware. Not sure why anyone would pay for yet another Pascal when mature & stable FreePascal is already out there, with SDL binding. Now also supports Android. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Android on your PC?11th August 2012 Android x86 can be installed on some netbooks, e.g. Eee PC |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Wishing for a Usable MacOSX Art Package4th August 2012 Pixen is ok for my needs. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Higgs Boson found?6th July 2012 I wasn't even aware that Higgs had lost his boson. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Why Python?19th June 2012 I assumed that an understanding of Python was a prerequisite. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Why Python?19th June 2012 I don't get why they want you to know Python for introductory AI. Learning Lisp or Prolog would make more sense. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
Mac issues31st January 2012 (Linkage) is a good resource for do-it-yourself troubleshooting and repair. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
array Problem12th January 2012 Unlikely. The library functions would be C/C++ not BlitzBasic. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
array Problem12th January 2012 Can't you just use the Replace$ function? [code] Function CHECK(E$[16]) For X = 1 To 16 E[X] = Replace(E[X],"B","*") Print E[X] Next End Function[/code] |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
array Problem10th January 2012 I guess if you use that method, you may as well not use an array at all. i.e. just use the built-in type iterators. They're stored in a linked-list, so effectively you'd have a dynamic array. |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
array Problem9th January 2012 I'm no Blitz expert, so apologies if this is utter crap. It seems to me you could wrap the string array in a custom type. This would be passed by reference, e.g. [code] Const Max = 5 Type StringArray Field s$[Max] End Type Function Dump(t.StringA*snip* |
|
|
|
|
Retro
|
C++ Pointer Loving23rd July 2011 If you're seeking to illustrate the use of references, it's a bad example. Not wanting to appear too critical... but the return statement in your increment() function is completely redundant. Actually, the function itself is inefficient and would probabl*snip* |
| More - Older Posts |
|
| |||||
|
| ||||||