123
-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0|310|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Off Topic -> MoCap with Kinect

Posted : Monday, 05 February 2018, 17:03
GfK
You can do motion capture with Kinect. How can anything be better than that?
Posted : Monday, 05 February 2018, 17:03
9572AD
Doing motion capture without Kinect would be demonstrably better.

-=-=-
All the raw, animal magnetism of a rutabaga.
Posted : Tuesday, 06 February 2018, 00:54
GfK
Um.. no. Kinect is actually excellent for this.