123
-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0|590|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Off Topic -> Maths/log help

Sat, 04 Jun 2011, 20:36
HoboBen
I've almost finished a long maths problem, but I'm stuck on the last bit:

16.3x = log(x) + 6.06

Given this, how do I find x?

Any hints would be very appreciated!

-=-=-
blog | work | code | more code
Sat, 04 Jun 2011, 20:46
JL235
No idea on the method, but Wolfram Alpha has solutions.
Sun, 05 Jun 2011, 01:23
HoboBen
Unfortunately the workings are more important than the answer in this case.

I managed to cancel out of the first x, which left me with a more manageable:

log(a x) = b

which becomes

ax = exp(b)

x = exp(b) / a

(where a and b are known integers)

I'm still now clear on how I would solve the first, but fortunately it doesn't seem necessary any more.

-=-=-
blog | work | code | more code