123
-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0|664|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Off Topic -> Actor/Actress Polls
Wed, 13 Aug 2014, 12:21
dna
 		@the_Poll: There’s an area to consider when including Buster in with these. He was one of the first big movies stars that the whole studio banked on. The others are not his category

-=-=-
DNA
Wed, 13 Aug 2014, 12:21
dna
 		Gene Kelly was also a great dancer, the others cannot compare in this regard.

-=-=-
DNA
Wed, 13 Aug 2014, 20:45
9572AD
 		I really have no respect for early film "actors". They all acted like actors, rather than like characters. Or go older and they're still doing Vaudeville.
Sure, it can be entertaining, but it's not acting.

-=-=-
All the raw, animal magnetism of a rutabaga.