123
-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0|371|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Off Topic -> Some of our Starcraft are missing...
Thu, 19 Jan 2012, 12:35
JL235
 		Starcraft 2 wasn’t short, I’d say it’s longer then the first
Thu, 19 Jan 2012, 12:35
9572AD
 		Well, I certainly didn't play it myself, but read a lot of reviews that were underwhelmed and heard a lot of people whinging about the "missing" campaigns.

-=-=-
All the raw, animal magnetism of a rutabaga.
Thu, 19 Jan 2012, 13:23
JL235
 		I was sceptical it was going to be short, since it's just one campaign. However it's actually pretty lengthy.

The missions are also far more varied then in the first Starcraft, and one of the real saving graces. I would say without a doubt, they are the best designed missions I have ever seen in a game.

Downsides are the plot, and the sequences between missions (they are filled with tonnes of optional, but totally pointless dialogue, which is just dull).

Overall it's an excellent game. Not as ground breaking as the first, but certainly worth buying at full price.