Jay's 2nd Blitz Speed Test

-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0\|486\|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Blitz -> Jay's 2nd Blitz Speed Test
Page : 1 2 Next Prev
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 06:52
Jayenkai	Blitz3DMan has suggested that it might be the image drawing that's the problem. I don't think it is, but best to be safe, right guys? This bit of code will create 100 random images, then draw them over and over again onto the screen, starting with 200, and ending up with lots and lots and lots! At the point that the framerate drops below 50* the program will make a note of the number of images onscreen, and start again. It will do this 5 times, and then start again with bigger images. Should take about 2 or 3 mins to complete the whole thing. (although I didn't time it! It just felt a long time!) Graphics 800,600,32,2 SetBuffer BackBuffer() timetoframe=MilliSecs() MostImages=0 Dim i(100) Repeats=5 LoopDone=LoadSound("C:\WINDOWS\Media\ding.wav") TotallyDone=LoadSound("C:\WINDOWS\Media\tada.wav") Dim Imagecount(Repeats) Global OutFile=WriteFile("JNKTest.txt") ImageSize=8 TotalLoops=6 For Loops=1 To TotalLoops For reps=1 To repeats For n=1 To 100 If i(n)>0 Then FreeImage i(n):i(n)=0 i(n)=CreateImage(ImageSize,ImageSize) SetBuffer ImageBuffer(i(n)) For x=1 To 1000 Color Rand(0,255),Rand(0,255),Rand(0,255) Plot Rand(0,ImageWidth(i(n))),Rand(0,ImageHeight(i(n))) Next Next SetBuffer BackBuffer() MostImage=0 LastTimeTook=0 TimeTook=0 timetoframe=MilliSecs() Images=200 Repeat Cls For n=1 To images DrawImage i(Rand(1,100)),Rand(0,800-ImageSize),Rand(0,600-ImageSize) Next ;If nextlot<MilliSecs() Then nextlot=MilliSecs()+2000:images=images+100 images=images+5 Color 0,0,0 Text 1,1,"Framerate : "+showframerate Text 1,21,"Images : "+images Text 1,41,"Most : "+MostImage Text 1,61,"Test "+(((Loops-1)Repeats)+reps)+" of "+(TotalLoopsRepeats) Color 255,255,255 Text 0,0,"Framerate : "+showframerate Text 0,20,"Images : "+images Text 0,40,"Most : "+MostImage Text 0,60,"Test "+(((Loops-1)Repeats)+reps)+" of "+(TotalLoopsRepeats) Gosub Framerate If ShowFrameRate>10 And ShowFrameRate<50 And MostImage=0 Then MostImage=images If KeyDown(1) Then End Until MostImage<>0 PlaySound LoopDone Imagecount(reps)=MostImage Next Average=0 Echo "---------" echo "Image size : "+imagesize echo "---------" For n=1 To Repeats echo "Test "+n+" : "+ImageCount(n) average=average+ImageCount(n) Next echo "Average "+average/repeats ImageSize=ImageSize2 Next PlaySound TotallyDone CloseFile outfile ExecFile ("JNKTest.txt") Delay 1500 DeleteFile ("JNKTest.txt") Function echo(txt$) WriteLine(outfile,txt$) End Function .framerate Lasttimetook=timetook timetook=MilliSecs()-TimetoFrame Showframerate=(2000/Float(LastTimetook+timetook)) timetoframe=MilliSecs() Flip False Return --v My results --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 2425 Test 2 : 2535 Test 3 : 2600 Test 4 : 2480 Test 5 : 2570 Average 2522 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 2490 Test 2 : 2525 Test 3 : 2515 Test 4 : 2520 Test 5 : 2510 Average 2512 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 2480 Test 2 : 2530 Test 3 : 2480 Test 4 : 2465 Test 5 : 2470 Average 2485 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 1595 Test 2 : 1515 Test 3 : 1555 Test 4 : 1500 Test 5 : 1475 Average 1528 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 610 Test 2 : 610 Test 3 : 545 Test 4 : 575 Test 5 : 600 Average 588 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 210 Test 2 : 210 Test 3 : 210 Test 4 : 210 Test 5 : 210 Average 210 --v Note, I chose a 50fps limit, incase some people's systems can't go above 60.. If a system can't go above 60, then the frame rate ticker-checker thing would be completely messed up! -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 09:15
JL235	--------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 1265 Test 2 : 900 Test 3 : 680 Test 4 : 1315 Test 5 : 505 Average 933 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 595 Test 2 : 1490 Test 3 : 1365 Test 4 : 1240 Test 5 : 1395 Average 1217 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 1965 Test 2 : 2135 Test 3 : 1120 Test 4 : 1575 Test 5 : 1455 Average 1650 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 1365 Test 2 : 230 Test 3 : 440 Test 4 : 770 Test 5 : 860 Average 733 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 795 Test 2 : 705 Test 3 : 795 Test 4 : 755 Test 5 : 795 Average 769 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 725 Test 2 : 755 Test 3 : 755 Test 4 : 730 Test 5 : 755 Average 744 --v If I remember, I'll run it again after a clean boot and on a different laptop. I don't think drawing multiple images through should really be a problem. Blitz should be able to cope. When it was playin sound though it was sometimes completely out of time with the image drawing. Strange. This has got me thinking on how useful a Blitz profiler would be. Their is one that comes with Ruby and it's so useful.
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 09:40
steve_ancell	Here's mine, is this good or bad ?. --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 280 Test 2 : 2030 Test 3 : 2065 Test 4 : 2070 Test 5 : 2075 Average 1704 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 2080 Test 2 : 2075 Test 3 : 2090 Test 4 : 2000 Test 5 : 2075 Average 2064 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 2065 Test 2 : 2065 Test 3 : 2060 Test 4 : 2065 Test 5 : 2020 Average 2055 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 1040 Test 2 : 1040 Test 3 : 1040 Test 4 : 1040 Test 5 : 1040 Average 1040 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 820 Test 2 : 820 Test 3 : 820 Test 4 : 820 Test 5 : 820 Average 820 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 750 Test 2 : 1030 Test 3 : 750 Test 4 : 750 Test 5 : 750 Average 806 --v
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 09:52
Jayenkai	Diablo, your results are incredibly chaotic! Maybe running it twice might get a better result? 64x64 pixel sprite abilities are more or less what I'm watching for, and we've not hit anything less than 500.. So. Not anything worrying, so far. Steve, both yours + Diablos appear to be better at doing larger sprites than mine is. Aww (But then, who would dare to fit that many 256x256 pixel sprites onscreen at once, anyway?) -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 09:55
Mog	Test ran with Computer #1 --------- --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 475 Test 2 : 955 Test 3 : 810 Test 4 : 820 Test 5 : 815 Average 775 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 780 Test 2 : 770 Test 3 : 780 Test 4 : 770 Test 5 : 775 Average 775 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 665 Test 2 : 810 Test 3 : 725 Test 4 : 740 Test 5 : 725 Average 733 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 675 Test 2 : 660 Test 3 : 655 Test 4 : 660 Test 5 : 330 Average 596 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 460 Test 2 : 1455 Test 3 : 1450 Test 4 : 1440 Test 5 : 1445 Average 1250 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 570 Test 2 : 345 Test 3 : 1000 Test 4 : 995 Test 5 : 995 Average 781 --v -=-=- I am Busy Mongoose - My Website Dev PC: AMD 8150-FX, 16gb Ram, GeForce GTX 680 2gb Current Project: Pyroxene
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 10:35
shroom_monk	Grrr... the silly thing's been running for more than 10 minutes, and it's only on test 16 out of 30!!! Shall I just give up now? This is taking forever! -=-=- A mushroom a day keeps the doctor away... Keep It Simple, Shroom!
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 10:39
shroom_monk	Hmmm... Having looked at the code, I'm convinced that this will never, ever finish, so I'm gonna start again! -=-=- A mushroom a day keeps the doctor away... Keep It Simple, Shroom!
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 10:46
shroom_monk	I discovered that if I changed the line If ShowFrameRate>10 And ShowFrameRate<50 And MostImage=0 Then MostImage=images --v to If ShowFrameRate=>0 And ShowFrameRate<50 And MostImage=0 Then MostImage=images --v then it went faster. But judging by my results, I think they're messed up and wrong... --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 210 Test 2 : 210 Test 3 : 210 Test 4 : 210 Test 5 : 210 Average 210 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 205 Test 2 : 205 Test 3 : 205 Test 4 : 205 Test 5 : 205 Average 205 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 205 Test 2 : 205 Test 3 : 205 Test 4 : 205 Test 5 : 205 Average 205 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 205 Test 2 : 205 Test 3 : 205 Test 4 : 205 Test 5 : 205 Average 205 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 205 Test 2 : 205 Test 3 : 205 Test 4 : 205 Test 5 : 205 Average 205 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 205 Test 2 : 205 Test 3 : 205 Test 4 : 205 Test 5 : 205 Average 205 --v On test 16, before I altered that line, the framerate was 0, most was 0, and the images had got to over 2000 and it wasn't going anywhere. So I gave up. -=-=- A mushroom a day keeps the doctor away... Keep It Simple, Shroom!
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 10:55
flying_cucco	Old-skool Tablet PC: --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 210 Test 2 : 215 Test 3 : 215 Test 4 : 215 Test 5 : 215 Average 214 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 215 Test 2 : 215 Test 3 : 215 Test 4 : 215 Test 5 : 215 Average 215 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 210 Test 2 : 210 Test 3 : 210 Test 4 : 210 Test 5 : 210 Average 210 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 205 Test 2 : 205 Test 3 : 205 Test 4 : 205 Test 5 : 205 Average 205 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 205 Test 2 : 205 Test 3 : 205 Test 4 : 205 Test 5 : 205 Average 205 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 220 Test 2 : 220 Test 3 : 220 Test 4 : 220 Test 5 : 220 Average 220 --v
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 11:02
Jayenkai	Well, looks like both TabletPC, and "A PC that by now probably has it's own Mushrooms" won't be running Hero any time soon! Shroom, try changing the "Images=200" to Images=0 and then see how far you get. -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 11:28
shroom_monk	Just because my computer has mushrooms growing inside it, doesn't neccesarily make it slow!!! Anyway, with Images=0, it was really quite fast! --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 10 Test 2 : 10 Test 3 : 15 Test 4 : 15 Test 5 : 15 Average 13 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 15 Test 2 : 15 Test 3 : 15 Test 4 : 15 Test 5 : 15 Average 15 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 15 Test 2 : 15 Test 3 : 15 Test 4 : 15 Test 5 : 15 Average 15 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 10 Test 2 : 10 Test 3 : 10 Test 4 : 10 Test 5 : 10 Average 10 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 10 Test 2 : 10 Test 3 : 10 Test 4 : 10 Test 5 : 10 Average 10 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 10 Test 2 : 10 Test 3 : 10 Test 4 : 10 Test 5 : 10 Average 10 --v -=-=- A mushroom a day keeps the doctor away... Keep It Simple, Shroom!
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 14:05
Blitz3Dman	--------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 1915 Test 2 : 2430 Test 3 : 1115 Test 4 : 2320 Test 5 : 1300 Average 1816 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 2065 Test 2 : 2150 Test 3 : 1140 Test 4 : 3320 Test 5 : 3270 Average 2389 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 790 Test 2 : 685 Test 3 : 1115 Test 4 : 1060 Test 5 : 800 Average 890 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 790 Test 2 : 395 Test 3 : 430 Test 4 : 630 Test 5 : 370 Average 523 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 285 Test 2 : 765 Test 3 : 700 Test 4 : 270 Test 5 : 230 Average 450 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 230 Test 2 : 210 Test 3 : 235 Test 4 : 230 Test 5 : 320 Average 245 --v -=-=- There are 10 kinds of people in this world - ( Insert 16 remarks about to what extent people know hex here )
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 14:47
Jayenkai	TEN!?! FFS, Shroom, TEN!? Your system can draw no more than ten images onscreen per frame? Is that right? That can't be right? Someone tell me that's not right!! -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 15:05
flying_cucco	Update: I changed images=200 to images=0 as suggested. A truer result is below --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 25 Test 2 : 25 Test 3 : 25 Test 4 : 25 Test 5 : 25 Average 25 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 25 Test 2 : 25 Test 3 : 25 Test 4 : 25 Test 5 : 25 Average 25 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 15 Test 2 : 15 Test 3 : 15 Test 4 : 15 Test 5 : 15 Average 15 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 15 Test 2 : 15 Test 3 : 15 Test 4 : 15 Test 5 : 15 Average 15 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 15 Test 2 : 15 Test 3 : 15 Test 4 : 15 Test 5 : 15 Average 15 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 10 Test 2 : 10 Test 3 : 15 Test 4 : 10 Test 5 : 10 Average 11 --v Obviously, pretty pants. But with fullscreen on things are a bit better --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 905 Test 2 : 985 Test 3 : 985 Test 4 : 1065 Test 5 : 780 Average 944 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 1020 Test 2 : 970 Test 3 : 970 Test 4 : 1040 Test 5 : 975 Average 995 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 205 Test 2 : 205 Test 3 : 205 Test 4 : 225 Test 5 : 185 Average 205 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 85 Test 2 : 90 Test 3 : 90 Test 4 : 90 Test 5 : 95 Average 90 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 30 Test 2 : 30 Test 3 : 25 Test 4 : 30 Test 5 : 30 Average 29 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 15 Test 2 : 15 Test 3 : 15 Test 4 : 15 Test 5 : 15 Average 15 --v
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 15:09
Jayenkai	Wowwie!! Good think I added a fullscreen option the other day! I always wondered why some people only ever did things in Fullscreen! I always found the constant res-change/screen flicker annoying, but if you're getting REALLY bad Windowed games, that's as good a reason as any! -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 15:19
Blitz3Dman	Here is my results having changed image=200 to image=0 --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 2800 Test 2 : 2200 Test 3 : 1575 Test 4 : 2700 Test 5 : 3080 Average 2471 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 2865 Test 2 : 3450 Test 3 : 3250 Test 4 : 3250 Test 5 : 3255 Average 3214 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 865 Test 2 : 935 Test 3 : 600 Test 4 : 1125 Test 5 : 1005 Average 906 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 770 Test 2 : 960 Test 3 : 1145 Test 4 : 880 Test 5 : 315 Average 814 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 580 Test 2 : 220 Test 3 : 150 Test 4 : 350 Test 5 : 640 Average 388 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 295 Test 2 : 75 Test 3 : 460 Test 4 : 315 Test 5 : 120 Average 253 --v Is this what I was supposed to have happen? -=-=- There are 10 kinds of people in this world - ( Insert 16 remarks about to what extent people know hex here )
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 15:34
JL235	After a fresh reboot: --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 1945 Test 2 : 265 Test 3 : 510 Test 4 : 255 Test 5 : 1430 Average 881 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 1415 Test 2 : 530 Test 3 : 1500 Test 4 : 1450 Test 5 : 1560 Average 1291 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 2070 Test 2 : 1270 Test 3 : 2320 Test 4 : 1050 Test 5 : 2200 Average 1782 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 855 Test 2 : 855 Test 3 : 2345 Test 4 : 855 Test 5 : 2305 Average 1443 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 790 Test 2 : 770 Test 3 : 2805 Test 4 : 430 Test 5 : 795 Average 1118 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 750 Test 2 : 835 Test 3 : 750 Test 4 : 750 Test 5 : 790 Average 775 --v After then changing the code a little, I got what looks like a far more consistent result. First the code: Graphics 800,600,32,2 SetBuffer BackBuffer() timetoframe=MilliSecs() MostImages=0 Dim i(100) Repeats=5 LoopDone=LoadSound("C:\WINDOWS\Media\ding.wav") TotallyDone=LoadSound("C:\WINDOWS\Media\tada.wav") Dim Imagecount(Repeats) Global OutFile=WriteFile("JNKTest.txt") ImageSize=8 TotalLoops=6 For Loops=1 To TotalLoops For reps=1 To repeats For n=1 To 100 If i(n)>0 Then FreeImage i(n):i(n)=0 i(n)=CreateImage(ImageSize,ImageSize) SetBuffer ImageBuffer(i(n)) For x=1 To 1000 Color Rand(0,255),Rand(0,255),Rand(0,255) Plot Rand(0,ImageWidth(i(n))),Rand(0,ImageHeight(i(n))) Next Next SetBuffer BackBuffer() SecondChance = 5 MostImage=0 LastTimeTook=0 TimeTook=0 timetoframe=MilliSecs() Images=200 Repeat Cls For n=1 To images DrawImage i(Rand(1,100)),Rand(0,800-ImageSize),Rand(0,600-ImageSize) Next ;If nextlot<MilliSecs() Then nextlot=MilliSecs()+2000:images=images+100 images=images+5 Color 0,0,0 Text 1,1,"Framerate : "+showframerate Text 1,21,"Images : "+images Text 1,41,"Most : "+MostImage Text 1,61,"Test "+(((Loops-1)Repeats)+reps)+" of "+(TotalLoopsRepeats) Text 1,81,"Second Chances: "+SecondChance Color 255,255,255 Text 0,0,"Framerate : "+showframerate Text 0,20,"Images : "+images Text 0,40,"Most : "+MostImage Text 0,60,"Test "+(((Loops-1)Repeats)+reps)+" of "+(TotalLoopsRepeats) Text 1,80,"Second Chances: "+SecondChance Gosub Framerate If ShowFrameRate>10 And ShowFrameRate<50 And MostImage=0 If SecondChance > 0 SecondChance = SecondChance-1 Else MostImage=images EndIf EndIf If KeyDown(1) Then End Until MostImage<>0 PlaySound LoopDone Imagecount(reps)=MostImage Next Average=0 Echo "---------" echo "Image size : "+imagesize echo "---------" For n=1 To Repeats echo "Test "+n+" : "+ImageCount(n) average=average+ImageCount(n) Next echo "Average "+average/repeats ImageSize=ImageSize*2 Next PlaySound TotallyDone CloseFile outfile ExecFile ("JNKTest.txt") Delay 1500 DeleteFile ("JNKTest.txt") Function echo(txt$) WriteLine(outfile,txt$) End Function .framerate Lasttimetook=timetook timetook=MilliSecs()-TimetoFrame Showframerate=(2000/Float(LastTimetook+timetook)) timetoframe=MilliSecs() Flip False Return --v Then the results: --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 1875 Test 2 : 2430 Test 3 : 2730 Test 4 : 2455 Test 5 : 2650 Average 2428 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 2705 Test 2 : 2625 Test 3 : 2700 Test 4 : 2285 Test 5 : 2350 Average 2533 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 1950 Test 2 : 2770 Test 3 : 2765 Test 4 : 2345 Test 5 : 2710 Average 2508 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 850 Test 2 : 2745 Test 3 : 2775 Test 4 : 915 Test 5 : 855 Average 1628 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 1875 Test 2 : 785 Test 3 : 2570 Test 4 : 2720 Test 5 : 1010 Average 1792 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 1270 Test 2 : 920 Test 3 : 1055 Test 4 : 1300 Test 5 : 1260 Average 1161 --v I've added a variable 'SecondChance' which starts at 5 and counts down to 0 when it fails. The idea is that what is causing the chaotic results before, is being caught out by the odd frame. By counting down instead it usually makes it count down 2 early on, then further into 0 when it really is being pushed. I presume Blitz also uses threads behind the scene, as I get some strange performances. Just the window was updating behind the reast the rest of the program. Playing the 'all complete' sound and opening notepad whilst still performing the last test for around 30 seconds after the program should have closed. Almost all the 'test complete' sounds were played behind when it should be, often by almost a whole test (maybe a second call to play the sound is prompting the first to finally run). I'd recommend removing the sounds. \|edit\| I also correctly indented your code. \|edit\|
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 15:44
Jayenkai	Playing the 'all complete' sound and opening notepad whilst still performing the last test for around 30 seconds after the program should have closed. It does WHAT?! I don't mind freakish results, but is it REALLY doing that? I mean, if it is, then.. That's just wrong. That's a language NOT doing what the code is saying. The "ExecFile" doesn't get called until all loops are done. If that isn't happening, then any and all of our games could potentially do anything, at any time! -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 16:05
JL235	That's what I thought. But maybe it's a Windows problem rather then a Blitz one.
Fri, 27 Apr 2007, 16:37
MikeT	I got the following... --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 2045 Test 2 : 2480 Test 3 : 2415 Test 4 : 2385 Test 5 : 2460 Average 2357 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 1495 Test 2 : 2485 Test 3 : 2480 Test 4 : 2475 Test 5 : 2450 Average 2277 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 2385 Test 2 : 2390 Test 3 : 2465 Test 4 : 2460 Test 5 : 2395 Average 2419 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 2400 Test 2 : 2400 Test 3 : 2365 Test 4 : 2435 Test 5 : 2415 Average 2403 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 1355 Test 2 : 1355 Test 3 : 1355 Test 4 : 1355 Test 5 : 1310 Average 1346 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 905 Test 2 : 905 Test 3 : 905 Test 4 : 905 Test 5 : 905 Average 905 --v athlon xp2500, 1gb ram, geforce 6600gt hope this helps MikeT -=-=- One life - live it
Sat, 28 Apr 2007, 00:15
shroom_monk	Yes Jay, your program is right! My Computer Sucks!!!!!!! \|edit\| And the results from fullscreen mode: --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 10 Test 2 : 45 Test 3 : 10 Test 4 : 55 Test 5 : 10 Average 26 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 10 Test 2 : 25 Test 3 : 15 Test 4 : 10 Test 5 : 20 Average 16 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 15 Test 2 : 15 Test 3 : 15 Test 4 : 15 Test 5 : 15 Average 15 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 10 Test 2 : 10 Test 3 : 10 Test 4 : 10 Test 5 : 10 Average 10 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 10 Test 2 : 10 Test 3 : 10 Test 4 : 10 Test 5 : 10 Average 10 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 10 Test 2 : 10 Test 3 : 10 Test 4 : 10 Test 5 : 10 Average 10 --v Oh, and test 30 was still running. \|edit\| -=-=- A mushroom a day keeps the doctor away... Keep It Simple, Shroom!
Sat, 28 Apr 2007, 01:34
flying_cucco	Ow thats bad. What graphics card do you have? If its intergrated, what chip is it? Have a look quickly by bringing up the 'run' box and typing 'dxdiag'. My Rage is 10 years old! If you have a P3 era box you should have better than that - maybe this is a driver/directx problem.
Sat, 28 Apr 2007, 01:41
shroom_monk	dxdiag Name: Intel® 82810 Graphics Controller Manufacturer: Intel Corporation Chip Type: n/a DAC Type: n/a Approx. Total Memory: 5.5MB Current Display Mode: 800 x 600 (24 bit) (default refresh rate) Monitor: hp pavilion mx70 \|edit\| ^That's from the 'Display' tab.^ \|edit\| -=-=- A mushroom a day keeps the doctor away... Keep It Simple, Shroom!
Sat, 28 Apr 2007, 04:56
Prospero	--------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 4165 Test 2 : 3710 Test 3 : 3705 Test 4 : 4750 Test 5 : 2405 Average 3747 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 4745 Test 2 : 4785 Test 3 : 4100 Test 4 : 4740 Test 5 : 4225 Average 4519 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 4665 Test 2 : 855 Test 3 : 4655 Test 4 : 4110 Test 5 : 4780 Average 3813 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 4710 Test 2 : 4705 Test 3 : 4570 Test 4 : 4595 Test 5 : 4735 Average 4663 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 3565 Test 2 : 3450 Test 3 : 3305 Test 4 : 3565 Test 5 : 3505 Average 3478 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 1470 Test 2 : 1460 Test 3 : 1470 Test 4 : 1410 Test 5 : 1255 Average 1413 --v Not sure what happened on image size 32 test 2 - think that it threw a wobbly when I moved the mouse over some taskbar items My PC: Windows XP Pro SP2 DirectX 9.0c Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 2Gb RAM 2x XFX Geforce 7900GS SLI (SLI doesn't make much difference. I got similar results with and without it activated ) -=-=- https://www.zolyx.co.uk/
Sat, 28 Apr 2007, 13:12
Nolan	--------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 210 Test 2 : 3275 Test 3 : 720 Test 4 : 660 Test 5 : 585 Average 1090 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 530 Test 2 : 380 Test 3 : 445 Test 4 : 440 Test 5 : 420 Average 443 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 1130 Test 2 : 1000 Test 3 : 545 Test 4 : 1115 Test 5 : 1080 Average 974 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 1240 Test 2 : 1395 Test 3 : 1130 Test 4 : 1235 Test 5 : 980 Average 1196 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 1345 Test 2 : 835 Test 3 : 1150 Test 4 : 1740 Test 5 : 1505 Average 1315 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 205 Test 2 : 205 Test 3 : 210 Test 4 : 205 Test 5 : 205 Average 206 --v AMD Athlon X2 3800+ 1Gb RAM Geforce 6100 -=-=- nolandc.com
Sat, 28 Apr 2007, 15:30
flying_cucco	My desktop PC: --------- Image size : 8 --------- Test 1 : 4800 Test 2 : 4855 Test 3 : 4985 Test 4 : 4690 Test 5 : 4920 Average 4850 --------- Image size : 16 --------- Test 1 : 5000 Test 2 : 4950 Test 3 : 4680 Test 4 : 4955 Test 5 : 4925 Average 4902 --------- Image size : 32 --------- Test 1 : 3900 Test 2 : 5060 Test 3 : 4910 Test 4 : 4915 Test 5 : 4910 Average 4739 --------- Image size : 64 --------- Test 1 : 2665 Test 2 : 2300 Test 3 : 3190 Test 4 : 2170 Test 5 : 5065 Average 3078 --------- Image size : 128 --------- Test 1 : 2280 Test 2 : 2335 Test 3 : 2280 Test 4 : 2040 Test 5 : 2285 Average 2244 --------- Image size : 256 --------- Test 1 : 855 Test 2 : 855 Test 3 : 250 Test 4 : 270 Test 5 : 855 Average 617 --v AMD Sempr0n 3000+ (Socket A), 2.1GHz 1 GB RAM, DDR 333MHz Nvidia GeForce 6600GT (AGP), 128MB Windows 2000 I too have noticed some really wierd things. the sounds played several seconds EARLY, then the test carried on drawing. It becomes noticeable in the last 10 tests. I thought I was imagining it, until the last one - "tada!" - fully two seconds before it finished adding and drawing images on the screen. \|edit\| And I don't know why the results pwn MikeT's, as we have roughly similar hardware. \|edit\|
Page : 1 2 Next Prev